Copied from here:
Weinbaum
and Wald receive messages from their future and thus gain some
knowledge of future events but cannot experience those events any sooner
than anyone else. One of these messages links Quincunx to Midsummer Century by
Blish. (46) In this second short novel, John Martels’ personality,
though not his body, is projected from 1985 to 25,000. Personalities are
semi-stable electromagnetic fields. Martels’ field is projected
accidentally and received by a preserved brain. He could return to 1985,
although he opts not to, so his "time-projection" is genuine time
travel. His experience is consistent with the Time Traveler’s theory
that it is our "consciousness" or "mental existences," not our bodies,
that move along time. Wald adds:
"And the consciousness of Robin Weinbaum is moving along that entity in that invisible direction." (45)
There
are problems with this theory. First, it contradicts the Time
Traveler’s practice, though not Wald’s. Secondly, the Time Traveler
describes "mental existences" not, e. g., as "fields" but as immaterial
and dimensionless which suggests that they are undetectable and even
non-existent. (47) Thirdly, as before, motion "along the Time-Dimension
with a uniform velocity" would take time so this dimension would not be time.
(47) Fourthly, the theory suggests that, before or after the passage
through human bodies of their minds, these bodies are mere automata
although indistinguishable from conscious organisms.
This
radical mind-body dualism leads to solipsism. Each of us has no way of
knowing whether other organisms are really conscious. My neighbor’s
mind, if he has one, may move along the fourth dimension more slowly or
quickly than mine. Thus, it may not be present in his body when I am
speaking to him. Indeed, it is unnecessary:
"He is not free in any way to change the shaping of the ultimate creature; all he can do is observe…" (45)
"…the
shaping of the ultimate creature…" includes the movements of his own
body and even of its vocal organs. I remember Blish suggesting in a
conversation at a science fiction convention that minds might move along
time at different rates but this is surely an absurd conclusion to
arrive at. If the conclusion is valid, then I cannot be sure that
Blish’s consciousness was present when it was suggested.
No comments:
Post a Comment