Showing posts with label The Prisoner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Prisoner. Show all posts

Friday, 18 May 2012

007, No 6 and V

007 = 7; No 6 = 6; V = 5 in Roman numerals. Thus: 7, 6, 5.

007 is James Bond in novels by Ian Fleming and his successors and in films starring Sean Connery and his successors. No 6 is the title character of Patrick McGoohan's The Prisoner TV series. V is the title character of Alan Moore's V for Vendetta graphic novel. (Three characters in four media: prose fiction (verbal); large and small screen drama (audiovisual); sequential art (visual-verbal).)

McGoohan borrowed from the James Bond films the idea of a powerful secret organisation with numbered members controlled by a mysterious "Number One." Moore did not borrow from McGoohan but did produce a parallel text addressing common themes. No 6 was so called because he was imprisoned in an island "Village" where he and his cottage were numbered 6. V was so called because he was imprisoned in Room V of a concentration camp. Later, fascist Britain resembled an island prison. V, a vendetta-waging anarchist terrorist, challenged the authorities as No 6 had challenged successive No 2's and the hidden No 1 in the Village. V was inspired by a letter passed between cells through a hole in the wall by the woman in Room IV. (Maintaining the numerical progression, Bond refers to a colleague numbered 008 and V refers to his fellow prisoner in Room IV.) We know of V only that he is male, not whether he is black, Jewish or homosexual or whether he was politically radical before his imprisonment.

Moore simultaneously wrote Marvelman and V, a superhero and a masked avenger, for Warrior magazine. Marvelman was directly descended, via Captain Marvel, from Superman whereas V was not directly descended from the archetypal comic book masked avenger, the Batman, although a Batman "Elseworld" story did show Wayne opposing an American dictatorship in an alternative history. V's appearance is based on that attributed to Guy Fawkes and he completes the job attempted by Fawkes. Like the Lone Ranger, V remains masked throughout. His face is unseen by the reader and even by his close assistant. In this respect at least, he also resembles Judge Dredd, a legalized vigilante in a futuristic city. (Moore also wrote an unpublished Dredd script, a "last Superman story" and a pivotal Batman/Joker story.)

In the Village, names are replaced by numbers but faces are not usually masked. When, in the episode "A, B and C," letters replace numbers, the previously unknown C leads No 6 to the masked D who, when unmasked, turns out to be the current No 2, but this occurs within an induced dream, thus in a "play within the play." In the concluding episode, No 6, unmasking No 1, significantly sees his own face. Prospero played by Vincent Price in the film The Masque of the Red Death had the same experience when he unmasked a red-garbed intruder who was his own personalized death.

At the end of V for Vendetta, V's assistant, Evey, does not unmask the dead V but realizes that her face must be behind the mask. She becomes V. His sabotage and assassinations have overthrown fascism. She hopefully will oversee without needing to intervene in the growth of freedom. But, like Asimov's Second Foundation, she and her new assistant will be able to intervene if necessary. In The Foundation Trilogy, an unpredictable mutant disrupted Seldon's Plan but the hidden Second Foundation existed to guard and restore the Plan. After the events of V for Vendetta, neo-fascists could seek to regain control. Evey/V might be able to prevent counter-revolution by encouraging more popular action. (She will not continue V1's strategy of individual assassinations.)

Bond conventionally contends with agents of a foreign dictatorship but does not change himself. The self-sufficient No 6 potentially frees himself. V, inspired by Valerie, and helped and succeeded by Evey, potentially frees society. Thus, the successive series form a progressive conceptual tetralogy:
 
first, Ian Fleming's twelve James Bond novels in which Bond mainly opposes Russian Intelligence (in fact, SPECTRE involvement in three of Fleming's later novels is film-derived); 

second, the first five Sean Connery James Bond films culminating in Bond's meeting with No 1, Ernst Stavro Blofeld, plus two further films with Blofeld as the acknowledged villain;

 
third, the seventeen episode Prisoner TV series culminating in the Prisoner's realization that he is the unmasked No 1;


fourth, the V for Vendetta graphic novel culminating in Evey's realization that she must be the masked V.

I exclude post-Fleming Bond novels, post-Connery Bond films, Prisoner spin-offs and the V for Vendetta film. At the time of writing, December 2009, I have not yet seen the new Prisoner TV series.


Who is V? When leading Evey to the roof of the building at the moment of her psychological liberation, he resembles a robed Christ but we should not regard a multiple manipulator and murderer as the Messiah. When addressing the public on video, he speaks as if he were mankind's creator but this is ironic. It has been suggested that V is Marvelman, who is deified in his own series. The only evidence for this identification, I think, is that, when seen in silhouette before donning the mask, V seems to be crew cut. Both V and MM result from, very different, government experiments. V's experience motivates him to overthrow that government. MM and his Pantheon are so powerful that they effortlessly displace the nuclear powers and the UN. V destroys a dystopia. MM builds a utopia. Their stories are complementary, not convergent. Like Superman (day) and Batman (night), they are archetypal opposites.
 
The anarchist V opposes all governments but has additional personal reasons to resist Norse Fire. He assassinates individuals not only because of their present positions in the state apparatus but also because of their past dealings with the man in Room V. For example, he forces the Bishop of London to consume a poisoned Communion wafer. The Bishop, who preached sermons dictated by the Fate computer to congregations including high Party members, had also previously been the concentration camp chaplain.

Much of the characterization, dialogue and plot in V for Vendetta is realistic but V's omniscience about the other characters is surreal. On the one hand, he is a particular character whose face was seen by his captors, though not by us, in the concentration camp. On the other hand, he is endlessly resourceful and manipulative and supremely confident that the state police will not find him hidden in the heart of London. Only the disaffected detective is going to find him and V somehow knows what the outcome of that encounter will be. He knows which Party widow will assassinate the Leader. Only the author can know so much about the characters. 
 
Authors can be incarnated in their stories. Very occasionally, the first person narrator really is the author. For example, CS Lewis exchanges letters with Ransom at the end of the first Ransom novel and meets him at the beginning of the second. But incarnated authors need not be narrators. The comic strip is mostly un-narrated and Alan Moore's incarnation in it is masked. Evey cannot see his face because she would have to look off the page to do so.

Bond, UNCLE and The Prisoner

From Page to Screen


Ian Fleming's twelve James Bond novels inspired many screen adaptations, imitations and parodies. One parodic imitation, with some input from Fleming, was The Man From UNCLE TV series. Danger Man, a pre-Bond TV spy series joined the Bond-wagon. The Prisoner, a post-Bond Danger Man sequel, featured high-tech intelligence-gathering and a powerful secret organisation with numbered members controlled by a mysterious "Number One," like the criminal organization SPECTRE in the James Bond films. This article focuses on the Bond novels and on these three TV series.

From Screen to Page

Adaptations from screen to prose have been less creative. There are novelizations of films and original novels based on TV series. UNCLE novels came first but were poorly written. David McDaniel's UNCLE novels presented a history for the villainous organization, THRUSH, deriving it from the main villain of the Sherlock Holmes series. The Prisoner was complete as a screen drama and did not need three novels, one by McDaniel, as sequels. (Years later, better written Smallville novels read like new episodes of the Smallville TV series.)

From Screen Treatment to Page 

Several authors have written prose and screen versions simultaneously: L Frank Baum (Oz); Arthur C Clarke (2001); Ian Fleming (Bond). The novel, Dr No, and the collection, For Your Eyes Only, were each based on a proposed TV series. The novel, Thunderball, was based on a feature film treatment. Thus, some page-screen interactions are "behind the scenes."

Cyclical Summaries

James Bond novels:
(i) Defeated by Bond, the Russian organization, SMERSH, disbands and some of its members join the independent organization, SPECTRE;
(ii) Bond destroys SPECTRE twice but its founder and chairman, Blofeld, known in the films as "Number One," escapes both times;
(iii) Bond kills Blofeld and re-engages Russian Intelligence.

UNCLE/The Return of The Man From UNCLE:
(i) Defeated by Napoleon Solo and Illya Kuryakin, the independent organization, THRUSH, disbands and a leading member is imprisoned;
(ii) Waverly dies, Solo retires, Kuryakin resigns, time passes;
(iii) The prisoner escapes, THRUSH is re-formed, UNCLE's new Director contacts Solo...

Danger Man/The Prisoner:
(i) Defeated by John Drake, Russian Intelligence survives;
(ii) a secret agent resigns but is immediately imprisoned by order of "Number One";
(iii a) the Prisoner realizes his identity and escapes but (pessimistically) only temporarily;
(iii b) the Prisoner realizes his identity and (optimistically) permanently escapes from an otherwise endless cycle.

Bond defeats Russian Intelligence, including its enforcement arm SMERSH, several times. UNCLE and Drake defeat their enemies many times. "...several..." and "...many..." reflect the difference in number of episodes between a series of novels and a TV series. Independent organizations as collective villains reflect detente. Bond and UNCLE end where they started. Only The Prisoner is ambiguous. The imprisoned former secret agent may or may not be Drake and may or may not escape permanently.

Patrick MacNee played John Steed in The Avengers TV series, Sir John Raleigh, the new UNCLE Director in The Return, and Tebbit, Bond's assistant in a later film, but these are different characters. Patrick McGoohan played Drake and the Prisoner but denied that they were the same character possibly for copyright reasons. The clear continuity between the two series implies that the characters are identical. Ingenious steps are taken to avoid naming the Prisoner. An Intelligence officer's daughter confronts her father with the accusation that he, the father, knows where "he" is to which the father replies, "I take it you are referring to your fiancee?" When claiming to be the rightful occupant of a London flat and owner of the car parked outside it, the Prisoner, asked his name, unaccountably pauses and offers what is clearly a false name, "Peter Smith." He has to think to avoid using the commoner "John Smith."
 
On the other hand, at least twice in The Prisoner, one actor does play two characters in different episodes.

The Bond Novels

We have come a long way but are back where we started. SMERSH, SPECTRE and Blofeld are no more but Russian Intelligence remains and other opponents would have replaced it if Fleming had lived longer and had continued writing. A seven-volume SMERSH cycle and a five-volume SPECTRE/Blofeld/aftermath cycle are complete and a third cycle could have followed. Insofar as Bond had become a mythical figure, the cyclical structure of the series might express an eternal recurrence. A character like Bond exists only to fight villainous organizations. Thus, he always defeats yet ever re-fights them. Fleming does not set out to say this but simply demonstrates it by writing the series.

When the first four novels had not (yet) been as successful as Fleming had hoped, he had planned to complete the series as a single five-volume cycle culminating not only in the expectable defeat of SMERSH but also in the unexpected death of Bond. Fleming was persuaded to continue the series and therefore to explain away Bond's apparent death, like Doyle with Holmes. After an unsuccessful attempt to make Bond a more rounded character, Fleming then decided to " '...write the same book over and over again...' with only the settings changing." (1)  Thus, "...the formula for James Bond was finally established..." at the mid-point of the series. (1) The first cycle was extended by two more volumes and SMERSH lingered on after its decisive defeat in From Russia, With Love.

Despite his decision to "...write the same book over and over again...," Fleming, tired and ill, did not expect to write any more novels after the seventh but instead wrote a TV series and, with Kevin McClory and Jack Whittingham, a film treatment. The TV series became a short story collection separating the two cycles of novels and the film treatment became the opening novel of the second cycle. Throughout this second cycle, Bond seems, but only seems, to be breaking out of the cyclical narrative:

in a single film-derived novel, the collective villain changes from Russian to independent and the continuing villain changes from an organization to an individual;

a Bond heroine supposedly co-writes with Fleming the story of her life including, in just a third of the book, the account of her single encounter with Bond;

Bond drafts a letter of resignation from the Secret Service;

he is married but instantly widowed;

he goes to pieces and is nearly fired by M;

he is moved to the Diplomatic Section and sent on a different kind of mission, no longer 007 but 7777;

he is missing, believed dead, with an obituary in The Times, while in fact amnesiac on a Japanese island;

he returns from Russia brainwashed to kill M;

de-brainwashed, he is sent on a mission that will either kill him or reinstate him in the Secret Service;

he is shot in the stomach and lies unconscious in a Jamaican swamp...

Threats to Bond's life were routine but threats to his status in the Secret Service were merely a new dramatic development. Fleming did experiment with different kinds of writing within the Bond canon but, since by now he was writing "...the same book over and over again...," there was no way that Bond was going to resign or be fired or be tried for attempted murder. He is back to his old self by the end of the twelfth novel. The concluding sentence is a perfect epitaph:

"For James Bond, the same view would always pall." (2)

The Return of The Man From UNCLE

This TV film connects ostentatiously with Bond but almost subliminally with The Prisoner. It cameos George Lazenby, who had played Bond once, driving an Aston Martin with the license plate JB 007. In a memorable moment for screen spy fiction, he and Solo nod to each other while driving in parallel. Ironically, Fleming had stolen the name James Bond from a writer on ornithology but is said to have suggested the name Napoleon Solo for the UNCLE TV series.

Prisoner-like, Kuryakin resigns from UNCLE although there is no mystery about his reason. He is disenchanted with the outcome of a mission. Publicity about the film included the information that Kuryakin's resignation was to have been based on the Prisoner's, complete with grim-faced pacing down a corridor etc, but this idea did not survive onto the screen.
   
The Prisoner

Possibly, The Prisoner TV series expresses an eternal recurrence not inadvertently but self-consciously. At the beginning, mysterious men disguised as undertakers kidnap the just-resigned secret agent from his London flat. (He resigns, is rendered unconscious and removed in a hearse. The beginning is an ending.) Very near the end of the concluding episode, when the Prisoner has escaped from the island prison of "the Village" and returned to London, the hearse re-passes his flat. I anticipated the hearse's return a moment before it occurred. It seemed appropriate. At the very end, he drives his car at great speed as he had done at the beginning when hastening to Secret Service Headquarters to resign. Is the cycle about to recur, as it did at the mid-point of the series in "Many Happy Returns"?

Perhaps, although I interpreted the concluding sequence differently on first viewing. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. The forces of unfreedom, represented by the hearse, threaten to return but the former Prisoner, now actively a "free man," is sufficiently on his guard and has broken the cycle. The hearse merely passes. We hope. Shortly before returning to his flat, he had looked directly into the camera as if to address viewers with something like "I am free. Are you?" When, at the very end, he drives the car built by himself at great speed, I suggest that this scene is a dynamic expression of his freedom, not the prelude to a recurrent descent into the underground car park. 

The Prisoner is reflective where Bond is not although both originated in the Cold War milieu. Are the Village authorities a foreign state organization like SMERSH, an independent organization like SPECTRE or THRUSH or even the same state organization that the hero had worked for? The last episode transcends these distinctions but most of the preceding action was set in this Fleming context. Fleming did not address larger issues but McGoohan and his collaborators did. Bond and Solo definitely remain imprisoned in a cycle of duality and unresolved conflict but the Prisoner at least potentially goes beyond it.

(1) Pearson, John. The Life of Ian Fleming, London, 1966, p. 307.
(2) Fleming, Ian. The Man With The Golden Gun, New York, 1965, p. 158.